🔗 Share this article

Over the weekend, Battlefield Studios introduced a fresh game mode titled Casual Breakthrough. To put it simply, this option mirrors the regular Breakthrough setup but includes several notable changes:

• Each team has just 8 real players, with the remaining filled by 32 bots.
• Actions done by human gamers grant complete experience points, while bot actions offer reduced XP.
• Only two maps can be played: Siege of Cairo and Empire State.
• Features like Player tags, accolades, and career stat updates are disabled.

In short, this mode delivers on its name: it's a laid-back version of Breakthrough. On the surface, one could assume it's a good idea, since it provides additional choices for gamers seeking different methods to have fun with the game. But, gaming history have taught us anything, it's that not everyone will be happy. Which is to say, many Battlefield 6 fans are mad.

Community Responses: Anger to Support

"Gamers prefer human opponents. Don't repeat the errors of your competitors," states a response to the official announcement. "Truly disappointing idea," says another. At the same time, on the Battlefield subreddit, one user notes, "It's unclear where we are headed with this title," while someone else lists all the issues they believe to be problematic in the game: "Resolve glitches, fix drone glitch, fix IVF rockets, adjust aiming after sprinting, improve hit detection. We don't need this AI-heavy playlist."

However, amid the criticism, there are players sharing how much they're enjoying the new mode. "It's very fun to practice, human participants keep it from being a total farmfest but it's very relaxed," reads a forum post. "The community fails to see that there are players who actually go outside and can't play this game 24/7. Allow them to find a middle ground," adds a different comment. One reply via social media clarifies that as they're "a parent gamer with limited time, this is great for me," and another praises the mode for "avoiding intense competition."

Valid Concerns and Community Input

Despite the support, there are valid points to complain about Casual Breakthrough. Some users have pointed out that it could increase wait times more extended for other modes due to the sheer number of playlists in the game already. Similarly, some areas often face mostly bots in the existing playlists. Additionally, it appears somewhat counterintuitive that the mode won't start without a minimum number of real players, even though it focuses mostly on fighting AI opponents.

Lastly, one of the biggest grievances is that a previous feature was promised to provide full XP, including AI matches, but that was removed when they tried to remove bot farms from the mode. Thus Casual Breakthrough seems like the player base compromising in the middle, according to forum feedback. A different user labels this addition as the devs "dropping the ball so hard, I experienced so much fun in the first couple of days, what prompted them to adjust it?"

Looking Ahead: Adjustments Be Made?

If the development team has proven anything to date with the latest installment, it is that they're listening and responding to feedback. Tasks that were overly hard were adjusted rapidly, as did the required Redsec challenges. It is likely that, if their data indicates this new playlist is underperforming to their expectations, they won't be shy to make further modifications.