🔗 Share this article

The tobacco company stands accused of “utter hypocrisy” for lobbying against anti-smoking regulations in Africa that currently exist in the UK.

African regulatory opposition

Correspondence acquired by reporters sent from the corporation's branch in Zambia to the African officials requests plans to ban tobacco marketing and promotional activities to be canceled or deferred.

The tobacco firm seeks changes to a proposed legislation that include decreasing the recommended coverage of pictorial cautions on cigarette packaging, the withdrawal of controls on flavored smoking items, and watered-down penalties for any firms breaking the new laws.

Health advocate reaction

“If I was a politician, I would say that they allow the safeguarding of the British people and perpetuate the death of the Zambian people,” said Master Chimbala.

Over seven thousand citizens a year pass away from tobacco-related illnesses, according to World Health Organization estimates.

The advocate mentioned the letter was understood to have been copied to various ministerial offices and was in distribution within civil society groups.

Worldwide lobbying patterns

It comes amid broader worries about corporate intervention with medical guidelines. In recent weeks, international health experts sounded an alarm that the tobacco industry was increasing attempts to undermine international regulations.

“Evidence exists of corporate influence everywhere. Tobacco company fingerprints are on delayed tax increases in Indonesia, halted laws in Zambia and even a compromised resolution at the UN international gathering,” said Jorge Alday.

Likely impacts

“Should anti-smoking legislation fails to be approved because of this letter, the consequences may be suffered in lives of people who might possibly give up cigarettes.”

The public health measure progressing through Zambia’s parliament includes proposals to go further UK legislation by including provisions for e-cigarettes, and requiring that pictorial cautions cover three-quarters of product packaging.

Corporate counter-proposals

Via documentation, the corporation proposes this be lowered to less than half “following international guideline limits”, delayed for at least 12 months after the law is enacted.

The WHO actually suggests a warning should cover at least fifty percent of the front of a pack “and attempt to encompass as much of the principal display areas as possible”. Within Britain, warnings are required to occupy sixty-five percent of a packet’s front and back.

Flavor restrictions debate

The corporation requests the removal of broad restrictions on flavored cigarette varieties, arguing that it would drive users to “illegally traded” products. It suggests prohibiting a smaller list of “tastes inspired by desserts, candy, energy drinks, soft drinks and alcohol drinks”. Each flavored smoking item have been banned in the UK since 2020.

The pending regulation proposes sanctions for different infractions “ranging from a fraction of annual sales to a decade in prison”.

Company justification

Through correspondence, the managing director of the Zambian branch claims the firm is “committed to good corporate behaviour” and “backs the goals of governments to reduce smoking incidence and the related medical consequences” but asserts that “specific rules can have negative and unanticipated results.”

Critic response

Chimbala said BAT’s proposed changes would “dilute these regulations so much that the impact needed for it to create lasting transformation in society will not be achieved”.

The reality that numerous similar measures operated within the UK, where BAT is headquartered, was “utter hypocrisy itself”, he commented.

“We live in a global village. When I cultivate smoking products in my property and gather the crop and sell it out – and my offspring don't use tobacco, but my neighbour’s children do … to benefit personally and all the subsequent offspring while my neighbor's family are dying … is in itself absolute spiritual collapse.”

Anti-smoking regulations in the UK or elsewhere had not caused companies to close, the advocate mentioned. “Regulations don't close the industry. It only protects the people.”

Official corporate statement

The company representative said: “The corporation runs its activities following with current country statutes. Moreover, the corporation engages in the country’s legislative process in line with the relevant frameworks which allow for interested party involvement in legislation creation.”

The corporation remained “not opposed to regulation”, they said, adding that minors should be protected from access to tobacco and nicotine.

“We advocate for progressive regulation to achieve intended community wellbeing objectives, while recognizing the range of privileges and responsibilities on industry, consumers and related stakeholders,” the spokesperson stated, adding that the corporation's recommendations “reflect the realities of the local commercial environment and tobacco industry, which includes rising levels of illicit trade”.

Zambia’s department of trade, commerce and industry was approached for comment.